Baahubali 2 (2017) Movie Rating

Baahubali 2: Beyond why Kattappa killed Baahubali, 6 questions that Baahubali The Conclusion must answerWritten by Manoj Kumar R. And we don’t mean the million dollar one involving Kattappa and Baahubali. In three days, the nation, no, scratch that, the world will find out the answer to the question that has preyed on their minds for the last two years since everyone watched director SS Rajamouli’s Baahubali: The Beginning.

And that question is, ? In fact, this one moment has made the wait for Baahubali 2 release excruciating. The twist in the end of the tale became a rage for many reasons. One, maybe it was too much of a shock for fans to come to terms with Baahubali being killed after showing his physical and mental prowess in the war against Kalakeya. Two, it was more shocking to fathom that the loyal king’s guard Kattappa is the one who stabbed Baahubali. It won’t be wrong to say that Kattappa was like a father figure to Amarendra Baahubali. Not just that, he was a true friend who fought besides Baahubali in the battlefield.

He wanted Baahubali to defeat Kalakeya as much as any other member of the audience so that he can ascend the throne of Mahishmati. And we can give 1. Kattappa’s undying love for Baahubali.

The epic film Baahubali 2 is all set to release on the big screen on 28th April 2017. The audience is eagerly waiting to watch the film on a silver screen.

Baahubali 2 - The Conclusion movie review: Fantastic visuals power Rajamouli’s film SS Rajamouli’s epic saga Baahubali 2: The Conclusion comes across richer and. He once again gives us our. Baahubali 2: Beyond why Kattappa killed Baahubali, 6 questions that Baahubali The Conclusion must answer Baahubali 2: Fans the world over have been hung upon why.

Bahubali (Baahubali) 2 Review

Not to mention that Kattappa pledges his loyalty to Shivudu aka Mahendra Baahubali the moment he realises he is his slain master’s son. But, still, he killed Baahubali. So we can understand the reasons as to why the fans the world over have been hung upon why Kattappa killed Baahubali? But, they are really missing the big picture here. We may have never seen an incomplete film like Baahubali 1 before, perhaps that is the secret of its mammoth success. We can tell good people from bad people in the film but we don’t know why the story of Baahubali came to the point where Kattappa turns into a backstabber. There are important unanswered questions, which we have overlooked this two years as we were too busy trying to crack this one mystery.

With Baahubali 2, we are hoping that SS Rajamouli answers all of them. Here are the six questions that the Prabhas and Rana Daggubati- starrer will have to deal with when it lands on Friday. Sins of Sivagami. Sivagami crawls out of a secret cave at the waterfall in the opening scene of Baahubali 1. She sacrifices her life protecting Baahubali’s son and before she drowns, she prays to Lord Shiva, asking him to take her life for her sins but keep Mahendra Baahubali safe. So what are the sins that she committed? Of course, that is besides marrying Bijjaladeva and giving birth to Bhallaladeva.

Baahubali 2: The Conclusion (Hindi) (2017), action drama fantasy released in Hindi language in theatre near you in. Know about Film reviews, lead cast & crew, photos. Dubai film critic Umair Sandhu has given a 5-star rating to Baahubali 2: The Conclusion, saying the movie got a standing ovation in the UAE.

Read . During his interaction, he claims that no one remembers Baahubali in Mahishmati except for him and her. And he hopes to meet him once again so that he can kill him ?

So he didn’t kill him permanently in his first attempt? And not to mention that his face turns pale as people begin to chant Baahubali’s name during his statue installation ceremony. He begins to ask if anyone see . There are a lot of fan theories that insist that Baahubali is still alive. Can this be true given Rajamouli himself has said that many of the fans have come very close to guessing the truth.

Who is Bhallaladeva’s wife? We know Bhallaladeva has a son, Prince Bhadra, whom Shivudu beheads with Kattappa’s sword just before the interval. But, who is his mother?

Now, this may be a key to many unasnwered questions. Why Bijjaladeva wants to kill his wife Sivagami?

A promo video of Bijjaladeva character dropped another bomb. He is the one who wants Sivagami dead and suggests the idea to Bhallaladeva?

Naked ambition? Read . But, we have no clue as to why they so badly want to save Devasena even it means sacrificing their own life. And they take pride in dying for this mission? What is the source of their loyalty towards Devasena?

Will Baahubali find out Bhallaladeva’s true colour? Bhallaladeva was ready to cross any line in order to become the king of Mahishmati. Download The New Paradise (2017) Movie there.

He always knew the potential of his brother Baahubali and wanted him dead. He tries to kill Baahubali in the first part itself. But, Baahubali seemed oblivious to the true intentions of Bhallaladeva. Does he ever find out Bhallaladeva’s true colour and deliver justice to him or meet his creator without knowing the schemes of his evil brother?

For all the latest Entertainment News, download Indian Express App.

Cocktail of grand stunts, visuals, terrible acting, closeted conservatism(Note: This is a review of the Hindi dubbed version of the Telugu film Baahubali: The Conclusion.)Fans of the Baahubali franchise have been discussing the hashtag #WKKB on the social media for a while now. If you have not guessed yet, that stands for “Why Kattappa Killed Baahubali”, a reference to the teaser in the closing scene of Baahubali: The Beginning in 2. You will not find spoilers on the #WKKB front in this review. Hold on to your seats though for the answer to a far more pressing question: #DRTOHS. The main characters in Baahubali 2 : The Conclusion.

In the first film, the tribal boy Shivudu (Prabhas) discovered that he is, in fact, Mahendra Baahubali, son of the late great Amarendra Baahubali (also Prabhas) who was robbed of the throne of Mahishmati kingdom by the machinations of his cruel cousin Bhallaladeva (Rana Daggubati) and uncle Bijjaladeva (Nassar). In Baahubali: The Conclusion, Mahendra hears the story of why and how that happened before setting off to avenge the deaths of his father and foster grandmother Sivagami (Ramya Krishna) and to free his mother Devasena (Anushka Shetty) from imprisonment in Mahishmati. As with the opening film, this one too is an Amar Chitra Katha- style blend of mythological references and palace intrigue laid out on a vast canvas of visual grandeur.

The proportion of the ingredients has been changed though, with myth and socially regressive themes being scaled down, family politics being scaled up, and the decibel levels being raised by several notches. The novelty of seeing an Indian film so laden with heavy special effects at such a scale from start to finish has worn off in the two years since Baahubali 1 was released, and it is hard now to forgive this one for Mahishmati’s plastic fa. Still, when the going is good, director S. S. Rajamouli’s Baahubali: The Conclusion is pleasing to the eye, in particular with its costumes, lavish interiors and innovative stunts.

A film of this nature obviously requires a suspension of disbelief in that last department. And frankly, if we are willing to swallow the invincibility of the likes of Tom Cruise, Bruce Willis and the various Bonds down the decades, then there is no reason why we should not buy that scene in which Amarendra mounts an elephant by walking up its trunk with the animal’s assistance and – my favourite of the lot – that war- time gimmick involving palm trees, shields and Newtonian physics towards the end.

Prabhas in a poster for Baahubali 2: The Conclusion. Those stunts, M. M. Kreem’s background score and the use of his songs to up the tempo of the narrative are what keep Baahubali: The Conclusion watchable even when the ridiculous over- acting becomes hard to take and the lack of freshness in the storyline sinks in.

Daggubati and Shetty – both gorgeous, both equally charismatic – keep themselves relatively in check, which is admirable considering that over- statement seems to be the demand of Rajamouli’s storytelling in this cinematic diptych (“relatively” being a key word here). Prabhas’ pretty face somewhat compensates for all that self- indulgent posing about he does, most notably while Devasena sings a song about Lord Krishna in a scene that unwittingly betrays her man’s Oedipus complex. The rest of the cast is laughable, with each rivalling the other for the year’s Worst Acting Awards. There is the usually wonderful Nassar who hams here to such an extent that he makes Sohrab Modi seem under- stated in comparison. The extras in every single scene – soldiers, courtiers and subjects – seem to be competing with the memorably howlarious bit- part players of the black- and- white era. And Subba Raju playing Devasena’s beau Kumara Varma is so bad, he should be declared a threat to society.

The queen of the film’s hamsters though (if such a word does not exist in the acting lexicon, then it should) is Krishna whose eyes remain fixed in a bulbous stare through the nearly three hours of this film’s running time. For all its seeming innocuousness, Baahubali: The Beginning was a horribly narrow- minded film that rolled out a range of stereotypes couched in its good- looking frames. How To Watch Radio Dreams (2017) Online. The black- denotes- evil clich. Disability coincidentally found its way only on to evil people.

And Sivagami’s power paled into insignificance in the face of Shivudu’s sexual violation and ultimate subjugation of the warrior Avanthika played by Tamannaah Bhatia. In that respect, Baahubali: The Conclusion is a step up. Devasena remains strong and active from start to finish, and is at no point reduced to being Shivudu or Amarendra’s sidekick.

She is a partner, not a prop. Still, the marginalisation of Avanthika in this film is almost tragic. In Part 1 she was a feisty woman whose mission was taken over by Shivudu once he . In that context, giving Bhatia fourth billing in the closing credits (after the two leading men and Shetty, but before Krishna) comes across as condescension, not an acknowledgement of her star status. There is so much else that is troubling in Rajamouli’s worldview: for one, the undisputed right of the Kshatriya to rule. If there is a question here, it is only: which Kshatriya – the good guy or the bad guy? And either way, it has to be one of the guys.

All the spectacle in the world, the Durga- esque positioning of Sivagami and Devasena, and the emphasis on Mahendra/Amarendra’s virtues cannot camouflage Baahubali’s disturbing romanticisation of social status- quoism. This then is the conclusion of this review: Baahubali: The Conclusion is a cocktail of fun stunts, attractive stars, grand settings, terrible acting, conflicted attitudes and closeted conservatism. A bow here to the choice of voices and to Manoj Muntashir, dialogue writer and lyricist for this version.)As is always the case, each viewer’s response to the film depends on her/his priorities. My priority, I admit, is not #WKKB but #DRTOHS: does Rana take off his shirt (in the film, as he has for the posters)?

Answer: yes he does. For good measure, so does Prabhas.

Both men rip off their upperwear in an extended scene of hand- to- hand combat, to reveal perfectly sculpted, stunningly muscular torsos in what has now become commercial Indian cinema’s most- used formula across all states. In the way it is told, #WKKB is not as dramatic a revelation as expected.